Hospital Interamericano de Medicina Avanzada (HIMA)
7 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2002–2015)
6 trusted published court opinions across 6 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Hospital Interamericano de Medicina Avanzada (HIMA) as an employer in 7 distinct federal employment cases between 2002 and 2015.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 2 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 had a mixed result, 1 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 were sent back to a lower court.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft and Wrongful Termination.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 6 distinct cases.
About this employer
Hospital Interamericano de Medicina Avanzada (HIMA) appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Unión General de Trabajadores v. Hospital Inter-Americano de Medicina Avanzada (2008) — Mixed Result. This case involved a dispute between the General Workers' Union (UGT) and Hospital Inter-Americano de Medicina Avanzada (HIMA) over unpaid wages owed to hospital employees. The union tried to sue the hospital on behalf of its members, claiming the hospital had stolen wages from workers. Read the ruling.
Unión General De Trabajadores v. Hospital Interamericano De Medicina Avanzada (2008) — Mixed Result. This case involved a dispute between a workers' union and Hospital Interamericano de Medicina Avanzada over unpaid wages. The Unión General de Trabajadores tried to sue the hospital on behalf of its members, claiming the hospital had stolen wages from unionized employees. Read the ruling.
del Carmen Guadalupe v. Negron-Agosto (2002) — Defendant Win. This case involved a dispute between an employee named del Carmen Guadalupe and Hospital Interamericano de Medicina Avanzada in Humacao, Puerto Rico. The employee was apparently fired and sued the hospital for wrongful termination, claiming the dismissal was improper. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft (2 of 6), Wrongful Termination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft and Wrongful Termination.
These published opinions sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Healthcare employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.