Hy-Vee, Inc.
50 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2005–2026)
2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases · 2 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Hy-Vee, Inc. as an employer in 50 distinct federal employment cases between 2005 and 2026.
The most common claims on record were Hostile Work Environment, Harassment, and Constructive Discharge.
Cases were filed across 1 state (IA).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Hy-Vee, Inc. appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Rodgers v. HY-VEE, INC. (2010) — Defendant Win. An employee sued Hy-Vee grocery store, claiming they experienced sexual harassment and a hostile work environment at work. The employee argued that the harassment was severe enough to make their workplace unbearable and that the company failed to properly address the situation. Read the ruling.
Hy-Vee, Inc. v. Employment Appeal Board (2005) — Plaintiff Win. A Hy-Vee employee quit her job because working conditions had become unbearable. When she applied for unemployment benefits, the company challenged her claim, arguing she wasn't eligible because she left without giving the employer advance warning. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Hostile Work Environment, Harassment, Constructive Discharge. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Hostile Work Environment, Harassment and Constructive Discharge.
Published opinions span Iowa. Iowa is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Iowa rulings.
These published opinions sit within the retail sector, where wage-and-hour, scheduling, and Title VII harassment claims are the dominant categories.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Retail employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.