J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
46 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2003–2026)
5 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases · 7 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. is named as a defendant in 46 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2003 and 2026.
Of the 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 had a mixed result, 1 ended in a ruling for the employer, and 1 was dismissed.
Across 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, recorded claim types include Discrimination, Failure To Accommodate, and Harassment.
The analyzed published opinions with a recorded state span 3 states, most often in NY.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Pirro v. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (2025) — Mixed Result. Read the ruling.
King v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. (2025) — Mixed Result. An employee named King filed a lawsuit against J.B. Hunt Transport, claiming the company discriminated against him based on a disability. King alleged the company refused to make necessary work adjustments for his condition, treated him badly because he complained, and created an uncomfortable workplace environment. Read the ruling.
Standifer v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. (2022) — Dismissed. Read the ruling.
Across 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, recorded claim types include Discrimination (4 of 5), Failure to Accommodate (3 of 5), Harassment (2 of 5). Browse the linked claim hubs for other published opinions involving these claim types. Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate and Harassment.
Published opinions span New York (2), Kansas (1), Georgia (1). New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings, Kansas rulings and Georgia rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
5 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court and docket; written opinions stay grouped inside their case. List captions may abbreviate names; public records and case details can identify the parties.
Other court records naming this party
2 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.