National Railroad Passenger Corporation
12 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1999–2025)
8 trusted published court opinions across 7 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list National Railroad Passenger Corporation as an employer in 12 distinct federal employment cases between 1999 and 2025.
Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 had a mixed result, 1 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 were dismissed.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Retaliation, and Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 4 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 7 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
National Railroad Passenger Corporation appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Fogbawah v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (2024) — Dismissed. Fogbawah filed a lawsuit against Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation) claiming he was treated unfairly and fired because of his disability, race, national origin, and age. He also claimed the company punished him for speaking up about discrimination. Read the ruling.
Christopher Peterson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (2023) — Plaintiff Win. Christopher Peterson worked as a locomotive engineer for Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation). Amtrak fired Peterson, citing his arrest record. However, Peterson had been acquitted of the charges—meaning he was found not guilty in court. Read the ruling.
Christopher Peterson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (2023) — Mixed Result. Christopher Peterson worked for Amtrak and was fired. He claimed the company wrongfully terminated him and retaliated against him. A key part of his complaint involved Amtrak using his arrest record to make the firing decision, which he argued violated California law. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination (6 of 8), Retaliation (4 of 8), Discrimination (4 of 8). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Retaliation and Discrimination.
Published opinions span California (2), Pennsylvania (2), District of Columbia (1), Delaware (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, Pennsylvania rulings, District of Columbia rulings and Delaware rulings.
These published opinions sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
8 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 4 summary-judgment opinions, 1 ended the case in National Railroad Passenger Corporation’s favor and 3 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Transportation & Logistics employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.