Skip to main content

Paccar, Inc.

Manufacturing

13 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2014–2023)

1 trusted published court opinion across 1 distinct case

What public court records show

In public federal court records, Paccar, Inc. is named as a defendant in 13 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2014 and 2023.

Across 1 trusted published opinion analyzed, recorded claim types include Retaliation and Whistleblower.

The analyzed published opinions with a recorded state span 1 state (TX).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

1
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 1 distinct case.

1
State

Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Paccar, Inc. appears in one trusted published federal employment opinion:

United States Department of Labor v. Paccar, Inc. d/b/a Peterbilt Motors Company (2022) — Defendant Win. Read the ruling.

Across 1 trusted published opinion analyzed, recorded claim types include Retaliation, Whistleblower. Browse the linked claim hubs for other published opinions involving these claim types. Retaliation and Whistleblower.

The published opinion came from Texas. Texas is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Texas rulings.

Claim Types

Retaliation
1 (100%)

States

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Federal court cases

public court records

One row per court and docket; written opinions stay grouped inside their case. List captions may abbreviate names; public records and case details can identify the parties.

Employee v. Paccar, Inc. d/b/a Peterbilt Motors Company
E.D. Tex. · Jan 2023
Docket closed
Employee v. Paccar, Inc.
E.D. Tex. · Jan 2023
Docket closed
United States Department of Labor v. Paccar, Inc. d/b/a Peterbilt Motors Company
E.D. Tex. · Sep 2022 · Texas · Retaliation
Defendant Win
Employee v. PACCAR, Inc.
S.D. Ohio · Jul 2022
Docket closed
Employee v. Paccar, Inc.
E.D. Tex. · Jul 2021
Docket closed
Employee v. Paccar Inc
N.D. Tex. · Nov 2020
Docket closed
Employee v. Paccar, Inc.
E.D. Okla. · Nov 2019
Docket closed
Employee v. PACCAR Inc.
S.D. Ohio · Jun 2017
Docket closed
Employee v. PACCAR Inc.
S.D. Ohio · Jun 2017
Docket closed
Employee v. Paccar, Inc.
E.D. Okla. · Nov 2016
Docket closed
Employee v. Paccar Inc
C.D. Cal. · Mar 2016
Docket closed
Employee v. Paccar, Inc.
E.D. Tex. · Sep 2015
Docket closed
Employee v. PACCAR, INC.
W.D. Ky. · Jul 2014
Docket closed
Showing 13 of 13

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.