Pepsi Cola Bottling Company of Fayetteville, Incorporated
3 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (1996–2001)
3 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Pepsi Cola Bottling Company of Fayetteville, Incorporated is named as a defendant in 3 federal cases coded as employment matters between 1996 and 2001.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Breach Of Contract, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 1 state (NC).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Pepsi Cola Bottling Company of Fayetteville, Incorporated appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
National Labor Relations Board v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Fayetteville, Inc. (2001) — Mixed Result. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) claimed that Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Fayetteville engaged in unfair labor practices. The NLRB is the government agency that enforces workers' rights to organize and bargain collectively. The company allegedly violated these protections under the National Labor Relations Act. Read the ruling.
National Labor Relations Board,petitioner v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Company of Fayetteville, Incorporated (2001) — Remanded. Read the ruling.
NLRB v. Pepsi Cola (1996) — Mixed Result. This case involved allegations that Pepsi Cola violated federal labor law during union organizing or collective bargaining activities. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which enforces workers' rights to organize and bargain collectively, filed charges against the company for unfair labor practices. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation, Breach of Contract, Wrongful Termination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Breach of Contract and Wrongful Termination.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
Published opinions span North Carolina. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. North Carolina rulings.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.