ProMedica Health System, Inc.
14 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2006–2026)
3 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases · 2 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list ProMedica Health System, Inc. as an employer in 14 distinct federal employment cases between 2006 and 2026.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Discrimination, and Harassment.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
About this employer
ProMedica Health System, Inc. appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Sandra Ziots v. Promedica Employment Services LLC (2024) — Defendant Win. Sandra Ziots brought an employment law case against ProMedica Employment Services LLC, a healthcare staffing company, in Michigan state court in April 2024. The specific details of what workplace issue led to this dispute are not available from the court records provided. Read the ruling.
Ferguson v. ProMedica Cent. Physicians, L.L.C. (2018) — Defendant Win. Ferguson worked for ProMedica Central Physicians and claimed the company fired him in retaliation for engaging in protected activity—likely reporting a workplace concern or safety violation. Ferguson sued, arguing the employer's stated reason for firing him was fake and that retaliation was the real motivation. Read the ruling.
National Labor Relations Board v. Promedica Health System, Inc. (2006) — Mixed Result. ProMedica Health Systems, a healthcare employer, faced charges that it violated workers' rights under federal labor law. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)—a government agency protecting worker rights—accused ProMedica of unfairly punishing employees for union-related activities and applying workplace rules uneq… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation, Discrimination, Harassment. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Discrimination and Harassment.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
These published opinions sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.
Claim Types
Related Laws
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Healthcare employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.