Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
18 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1984–2026)
3 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases · 3 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. as an employer in 18 distinct federal employment cases between 1984 and 2026.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Discrimination, and Whistleblower.
Cases were filed across 1 state (OH).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Ryder Truck Renal v. NLRB (2005) — Plaintiff Win. Two employees at Ryder Truck Rental were fired after they got involved in union activities at their workplace. The employees complained that Ryder retaliated against them for supporting the union. Read the ruling.
Ryder Truck Rental, Doing Business as Ryder Transportation Services v. National Labor Relations Board (2005) — Defendant Win. Ryder Truck Rental fired two employees, Bullman and Feldscher, after they engaged in union activities at work. The employees believed they were fired because of their involvement with the union, not for legitimate work-related reasons. Read the ruling.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc (1984) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved employment discrimination claims against Ryder Truck Lines, a major trucking company. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit alleging that the company engaged in discriminatory practices against its workers, though the specific details of the discrimination claims are not… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation, Discrimination, Whistleblower. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Discrimination and Whistleblower.
Published opinions span Ohio. Ohio is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Ohio rulings.
These published opinions sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Transportation & Logistics employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.