Schneider Electric USA, Inc.
18 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2010–2025)
4 trusted published court opinions analyzed; 3 map to 3 distinct cases · 2 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Schneider Electric USA, Inc. as an employer in 18 distinct federal employment cases between 2010 and 2025.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Discrimination, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in MA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Schneider Electric USA, Inc. appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Adams v. Schneider Electric USA (2023) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved an employment law dispute between an employee named Adams and Schneider Electric USA, a major electrical equipment company. The case was filed in Massachusetts court in June 2023, but the specific details about what workplace issue sparked the legal disagreement are not available in the court records… Read the ruling.
MARK A. ADAMS v. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA. (2022) — Plaintiff Win. Mark Adams worked for Schneider Electric USA and was fired during a company layoff. Adams believed he was let go because of his age, not for legitimate business reasons. Schneider Electric argued the court should dismiss the case without a trial, claiming the company had valid reasons for the termination. Read the ruling.
Schneider Electric USA, Inc. D/B/A Schneider Electric v. Maria Ramirez (2021) — Defendant Win. Maria Ramirez worked as a temporary employee through a staffing agency at Schneider Electric. She filed claims of retaliation and wrongful termination, arguing that Schneider Electric violated Texas labor laws by punishing her after she filed a workers' compensation claim. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination, Discrimination, Retaliation. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Discrimination and Retaliation.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: ADA (42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117) — The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in all aspects of employment. See the ADA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. ADA.
Published opinions span Massachusetts (2), Texas (1). Massachusetts is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Massachusetts rulings and Texas rulings.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Manufacturing employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.