Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
121 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2010–2026)
6 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases · 5 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. as an employer in 121 distinct federal employment cases between 2010 and 2026.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 2 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 had a mixed result, 1 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 settled.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft, Retaliation, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 3 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Ulloa II v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. (2024) — Mixed Result. An employee filed a lawsuit against Securitas Security Services claiming the company failed to pay wages properly. The worker sought to turn this into a class action lawsuit, meaning other employees could join and claim similar wage problems. Read the ruling.
Ulloa II v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. (2023) — Mixed Result. This case involved a dispute between workers and Securitas Security Services USA, a major security company, over wage and hour practices and labor law violations. The workers claimed the company violated laws regarding how employees should be paid for their work time and working conditions. Read the ruling.
Desrosiers v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. (2021) — Settlement. This case involved a dispute between a worker named Desrosiers and Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., a large security company. Desrosiers claimed that Securitas violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which is the federal law that governs minimum wage and overtime pay requirements. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft (3 of 6), Retaliation, Wrongful Termination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft, Retaliation and Wrongful Termination.
Published opinions span California (2), Minnesota (1), New York (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, Minnesota rulings and New York rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Settlement / consent decree
- The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.