University of Maryland, Baltimore
25 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2012–2025)
5 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases · 6 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list University of Maryland, Baltimore as an employer in 25 distinct federal employment cases between 2012 and 2025.
Of the 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 2 were dismissed, 2 had a mixed result, and 1 ended in a ruling for the employer.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Discrimination, and Harassment.
Cases were filed across 1 state (MD).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
University of Maryland, Baltimore appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Perkins v. University of Maryland School of Nursing (2025) — Dismissed. This case involved a dispute between an employee named Perkins and the University of Maryland School of Nursing over disability-related issues in the workplace. Perkins claimed that the university discriminated against them because of a disability and failed to provide necessary accommodations that would have allowed t… Read the ruling.
Sharifi v. University of Maryland, Baltimore (2024) — Defendant Win. A worker at the University of Maryland, Baltimore filed a lawsuit claiming discrimination, retaliation, harassment, and constructive discharge (being forced to quit). Read the ruling.
Spiller-Holtzman v. University of Maryland, Baltimore (2023) — Mixed Result. This case involved an employment-related dispute between an employee (or former employee) named Spiller-Holtzman and the University of Maryland, Baltimore. The specific details of what happened between the worker and the university are not available from the court records provided. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (4 of 5), Discrimination (3 of 5), Harassment (3 of 5). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Discrimination and Harassment.
Published opinions span Maryland. Maryland is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Maryland rulings.
These published opinions sit within the education sector, where Title IX intersects with Title VII and tenure-revocation cases raise heightened procedural protections.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
5 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Education employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.