U.S. Department of Justice
15 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1998–2022)
19 trusted published court opinions across 15 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list U.S. Department of Justice as an employer in 15 distinct federal employment cases between 1998 and 2022.
Of the 19 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 8 ended in a ruling for the employer, 5 ended in a ruling for the worker, 3 were sent back to a lower court, and 2 were dismissed.
Plaintiffs won 5 of 16 adjudicated opinions (31%).
The most common claims on record were Whistleblower, Retaliation, and Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 6 states, most often in DC.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 15 distinct cases.
5 of 16 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
U.S. Department of Justice appears in 19 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Adam Delgado v. U.S. Department of Justice (2020) — Plaintiff Win. Adam Delgado, a federal employee, had a workplace dispute with the U.S. Department of Justice that led to a court case. The specific details of what happened between Delgado and his employer are not available from the court records, but the case involved employment law issues that were serious enough to reach the feder… Read the ruling.
Adam Delgado v. U.S. Department of Justice (2020) — Remanded. This case involved Adam Delgado, who filed an employment-related lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice in 2020. The specific details of Delgado's complaint and the nature of his workplace dispute are not available from the provided case information. Read the ruling.
Adam Delgado v. U.S. Department of Justice (2020) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved Adam Delgado, who brought an employment-related legal claim against his employer, the U.S. Department of Justice. The dispute was filed in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in October 2020, indicating it likely involved a federal employment matter or an appeal from a lower court decision. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Whistleblower (6 of 19), Retaliation (5 of 19), Discrimination (3 of 19). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Whistleblower, Retaliation and Discrimination.
Published opinions span District of Columbia (1), Ohio (1), New York (1), Arkansas (1). District of Columbia is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. District of Columbia rulings, Ohio rulings, New York rulings and Arkansas rulings.
These published opinions sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
19 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 2 summary-judgment opinions, 2 ended the case in U.S. Department of Justice’s favor and 0 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Government & Public Sector employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.