U.S. Office of Personnel Management
6 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2009–2024)
5 trusted published court opinions across 4 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list U.S. Office of Personnel Management as an employer in 6 distinct federal employment cases between 2009 and 2024.
Of the 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 were dismissed and 2 had a mixed result.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, and Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 3 states, most often in DC.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 4 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
U.S. Office of Personnel Management appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Ogden v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management (2024) — Dismissed. Ogden filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, a federal government agency. The case involved disputes about Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) disability benefits—benefits that help federal workers who become disabled and can no longer work. Read the ruling.
(PS) Charles v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management (2020) — Dismissed. Charles applied for jobs with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management and believed he was treated unfairly because of his age. He filed a lawsuit claiming age discrimination under federal employment laws. Read the ruling.
(PS) Charles v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management (2020) — Dismissed. Charles filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Office of Personnel Management claiming she was treated unfairly because of her age. She applied for jobs but believed she didn't get hired due to age discrimination. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (2 of 5), Age Discrimination (2 of 5), Wrongful Termination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Age Discrimination and Wrongful Termination.
Published opinions span District of Columbia (2), California (2), Maryland (1). District of Columbia is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. District of Columbia rulings, California rulings and Maryland rulings.
These published opinions sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
5 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Government & Public Sector employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.