Visionquest National LTD
6 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2013–2018)
1 trusted published court opinion across 1 distinct case
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Visionquest National LTD is named as a defendant in 6 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2013 and 2018.
Across 1 trusted published opinion analyzed, recorded claim types include Discrimination, Retaliation, and Hostile Work Environment.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 1 distinct case.
About this employer
Visionquest National LTD appears in one trusted published federal employment opinion:
Wagenhoffer v. VisionQuest National LTD (2016) — Mixed Result. This case involved a female employee who sued her former employer, VisionQuest National LTD, claiming she faced gender discrimination, retaliation, and a hostile work environment that led to her wrongful termination. The worker also alleged that the company interfered with her ability to find new employment. Read the ruling.
Across 1 trusted published opinion analyzed, recorded claim types include Discrimination, Retaliation, Hostile Work Environment. Browse the linked claim hubs for other published opinions involving these claim types. Discrimination, Retaliation and Hostile Work Environment.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court and docket; written opinions stay grouped inside their case. List captions may abbreviate names; public records and case details can identify the parties.
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.