Washington Hospital Center
14 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1980–2018)
11 trusted published court opinions across 11 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Washington Hospital Center as an employer in 14 distinct federal employment cases between 1980 and 2018.
Of the 11 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 were sent back to a lower court, 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 3 had a mixed result, and 1 ended in a ruling for the worker.
The most common claims on record were Workers Compensation, Wrongful Termination, and Wage Theft.
Cases were filed across 1 state (DC).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 11 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Washington Hospital Center appears in 11 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Wiley v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (2009) — Defendant Win. This case involved a dispute over workers' compensation benefits. An employee of Washington Hospital Center filed a claim with the D.C. Department of Employment Services seeking temporary total disability benefits (payments while unable to work due to injury) and reimbursement for medical expenses from a physician she… Read the ruling.
Washington Hospital Center v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (2009) — Mixed Result. This case involved a dispute between Washington Hospital Center and a former employee over disability benefits. The employee had been injured and claimed she deserved permanent total disability benefits from the District of Columbia's employment services department. Read the ruling.
Golding-Alleyne v. Department of Employment Services (2009) — Defendant Win. Ms. Golding-Alleyne, an employee at Washington Hospital Center, filed a workers' compensation claim seeking permanent partial disability benefits for an injury to her left leg that she claimed happened at work. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Workers’ Compensation (4 of 11), Wrongful Termination (2 of 11), Wage Theft. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Workers’ Compensation, Wrongful Termination and Wage Theft.
Published opinions span District of Columbia. District of Columbia is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. District of Columbia rulings.
These published opinions sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
11 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Healthcare employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.