Xerox Business Services, LLC
16 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (1998–2018)
2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Xerox Business Services, LLC is named as a defendant in 16 federal cases coded as employment matters between 1998 and 2018.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Retaliation, and Harassment.
Cases were filed across 1 state (NY).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Xerox Business Services, LLC appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Patterson v. Xerox Corporation (2010) — Defendant Win. This case involved an employee named Patterson who sued Xerox Corporation for workplace discrimination. Patterson claimed that Xerox treated him unfairly based on his protected characteristics, which likely included factors like race, age, gender, or disability status under federal anti-discrimination laws. Read the ruling.
Wado v. Xerox Corp. (1998) — Defendant Win. This case involved an employee named Wado who worked for Xerox Corporation and filed a discrimination lawsuit against the company. Wado claimed that Xerox discriminated against them in the workplace, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not provided in the available court records. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Retaliation, Harassment. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Retaliation and Harassment.
Published opinions span New York. New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings.
These published opinions sit within the technology sector, where age-discrimination, non-compete, and whistleblower-retaliation claims appear frequently.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.