Skip to main content

Randi Lynn Butler v. Joseph Parker Mozingo

MISSCTAPPNovember 12, 2019No. NO. 2018-CA-00673-COA
Plaintiff WinCustom Image Pros LLC$2,908.5 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Wilson, Wilson, Barnes, Carlton, Wilson, Tindell, McDonald, Lawrence, McCarty, Greenlee, Westbrooks
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment
State
Arizona
Circuit
9th Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendants for failure to pay minimum wages. Plaintiff recovered $2,341.50 against Custom Image Pros LLC and $2,908.50 jointly and severally against all three defendants.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Randi Lynn Butler sued her employer Custom Image Pros LLC and Joseph Parker Mozingo for not paying her minimum wages that she was legally owed. The defendants failed to respond to the lawsuit or appear in court to defend themselves. **What the Court Decided** Because the employer and owner didn't show up to court or file any response, the judge ruled in Butler's favor by default. The court ordered Custom Image Pros LLC to pay Butler $2,341.50 in unpaid wages. Additionally, the court made all three defendants (the company and individuals) jointly responsible for paying her $2,908.50 total, meaning she could collect the full amount from any of them. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that workers can successfully sue employers who don't pay minimum wage, even when employers ignore the lawsuit completely. When employers fail to respond to wage theft claims in court, judges will rule in favor of workers by default. The joint responsibility aspect is also important - it means workers can pursue both the company and individual owners/managers for unpaid wages, giving them better chances of actually collecting the money they're owed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.