Skip to main content

Daniel Russo and Reilly Cavanaugh Versus Onpath Federal Credit Union

La. Ct. App.May 29, 2024No. 23-CA-537
Defendant WinOnPath Federal Credit Union
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
June B. Darensburg
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractWage Theft

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment dismissing plaintiffs' claims for unpaid incentive plan compensation. Although the court found the incentive payments constituted wages under Louisiana law, it upheld the trial court's interpretation that no additional amounts beyond what was paid ($31,279.09 per employee) were owed under the contract terms.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.