No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiffs achieved final approval of a $500,000 class settlement in a wage-and-hour action involving part-time promotional specialists. The settlement provides $202,775 in net class distributions after attorney's fees ($125,000), costs ($54,730), settlement administration ($15,995), and PAGA penalties ($100,000).
This case involved a dispute between an employee named Cipolla and their employer, Team Enterprises, LLC, over alleged violations of federal wage and hour laws. Cipolla claimed that the company failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace pay requirements.
The court dismissed Cipolla's case, meaning the judge threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money to the employee. While the specific details of why the case was dismissed aren't provided in the excerpt, dismissals typically happen when employees can't prove their claims or when there are procedural issues with how the lawsuit was filed.
This case matters for workers because it highlights the importance of understanding your rights under federal wage and hour laws. The FLSA requires employers to pay at least minimum wage and overtime pay (time-and-a-half) for hours worked over 40 in a week for most employees. However, successfully proving FLSA violations in court requires proper documentation and evidence. Workers should keep detailed records of their hours worked and pay received, and understand that not all wage disputes will result in successful lawsuits, even when filed under important federal protections.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Cipolla from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.