Skip to main content

Hodges v. Gloria

S.D. Cal.June 24, 2024No. 3:23-cv-02065
Plaintiff WinThe Promise Keepers, Inc.$300,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiff Kendra Ross obtained a default judgment against The Promise Keepers for $300,000 plus post-judgment interest under the Kansas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. Her motion to amend the judgment was denied.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins $300,000 After Employer Breaks Contract Promise** Kendra Ross sued her former employer, The Promise Keepers, Inc., for breaking their employment contract. The company apparently failed to honor the terms of their agreement with Ross, leading to a breach of contract lawsuit. The court ruled in Ross's favor, awarding her $300,000 in damages plus additional interest that continues to grow after the judgment. The company did not properly defend itself in court, resulting in what's called a "default judgment" - essentially an automatic win for Ross. The court also noted that the case involved Kansas laws about fraudulent transfers, suggesting the employer may have tried to move money or assets to avoid paying what they owed. However, Ross's request to change or add to the judgment was denied by the court. This case shows that workers have real legal protection when employers break their promises. Employment contracts are binding agreements, and companies that violate them can face significant financial consequences. Workers should know that courts will enforce these agreements and award substantial damages when employers fail to keep their word. The $300,000 award demonstrates that contract violations can be costly for employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.