Skip to main content

Central Laborers' Pension Welfare and Annuity Funds v. Soldier Concrete Construction, LLC

S.D. Ill.August 19, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01512
Plaintiff WinDebra Lynn Coals, Inc.$68,354.78 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff Danny Templeton prevailed on his motion for summary judgment to enforce a Black Lung Benefits Act award. The court enjoined the defendants (DLC, its officers Evans and Anderson, and insurer AFI) to pay benefits, penalties, interest, and attorney fees totaling over $68,000, though defendant Gary Asher was found not personally liable.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Orders Company to Pay Black Lung Benefits to Coal Worker** This case involved a coal worker named Danny Templeton who was fighting to get black lung benefits that had already been awarded to him under federal law. Templeton had previously won his case for black lung benefits, but his former employer, Debra Lynn Coals, Inc. (DLC), along with company officers and their insurance company, refused to pay what they owed him. The court ruled in favor of Templeton, ordering DLC and the other defendants to pay over $68,000 in benefits, penalties, interest, and attorney fees. The judge found that the defendants had no valid excuse for refusing to pay the benefits that Templeton was legally entitled to receive. However, the court determined that one individual defendant, Gary Asher, was not personally responsible for the payments. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling reinforces that employers and their insurers cannot simply ignore legal orders to pay workers' compensation benefits, including black lung benefits for coal workers. When companies refuse to pay court-ordered benefits, workers can take legal action to force compliance and may be entitled to additional penalties and attorney fees on top of their original benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.