Martinenko v. 212 Steakhouse Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court adopted magistrate judge's recommendation, granting summary judgment in plaintiffs' favor on FLSA overtime claims and NYLL minimum wage, overtime, and spread of hours claims for the certified class. Court denied defendant's motion to decertify the class and partially addressed wage notice/statement claims.
What This Ruling Means
Martinenko v. 212 Steakhouse Inc. — Plain English Summary
What Happened:
Workers at 212 Steakhouse filed a lawsuit claiming the restaurant violated wage and labor laws. They alleged the employer failed to pay overtime properly, didn't pay minimum wage fairly, and didn't follow rules about work hours. The case was brought on behalf of multiple employees as a group lawsuit.
What the Court Decided:
The court ruled in favor of the workers. A judge approved the magistrate's recommendation to grant the workers' claims for overtime violations under federal law and minimum wage violations under New York state law. The court also rejected the restaurant's attempt to break up the group lawsuit, allowing the case to proceed on behalf of all affected employees.
Why This Matters for Workers:
This decision helps protect restaurant and service industry workers by holding employers accountable for wage violations. When courts side with workers in group lawsuits, it sends a message that employers must follow wage laws. It also shows that workers can band together to challenge unfair pay practices, making it easier to pursue justice rather than fighting alone.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Martinenko from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.