Skip to main content

Martinenko v. 212 Steakhouse Inc.

S.D.N.Y.December 23, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00518
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The case is a Fair Labor Standards Act (wage and hour) dispute. No outcome details are provided in the input.

What This Ruling Means

This case involved restaurant workers who sued both their employer, 212 Steakhouse Inc. (operated by someone named Sutton), and the City of New York for unpaid wages and other employment violations. The court reached a split decision. The workers won completely against the steakhouse and its operator Sutton, who apparently failed to properly defend the case, resulting in a default judgment. The jury also awarded each worker $3,500 in punitive damages, which are extra penalties meant to punish bad behavior by employers. However, the workers lost their entire case against the City of New York. The court also ordered the defendants to pay $27,912.78 to cover the workers' legal fees and court costs. This case shows workers that wage theft lawsuits can be successful, especially when employers don't properly respond to court cases. The punitive damages award suggests the employer's conduct was particularly bad. However, it also demonstrates that winning against one employer doesn't guarantee success against all defendants in a case. The substantial attorneys' fees award is significant because it means workers who win wage cases may be able to recover the costs of hiring lawyers, making it more feasible for workers to pursue legitimate wage claims in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.