212 Steakhouse Inc.
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2014–2024)
3 trusted published court opinions across 1 distinct case
What public court records show
Public federal court records list 212 Steakhouse Inc. as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2014 and 2024.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft, Wrongful Termination, and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 1 state (NY).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 1 distinct case.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
212 Steakhouse Inc. appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Martinenko v. 212 Steakhouse Inc. (2024) — Plaintiff Win. Workers at 212 Steakhouse sued their employer, claiming the restaurant failed to pay them properly and wrongfully fired someone. The employees argued the steakhouse violated wage and hour laws by not compensating them correctly. Read the ruling.
Martinenko v. 212 Steakhouse Inc. (2024) — Mixed Result. Workers at 212 Steakhouse sued the restaurant, claiming they weren't paid correctly. Specifically, they said the company failed to pay overtime wages required by federal law, didn't pay minimum wage properly, and didn't follow rules about how work hours were scheduled throughout the day. Read the ruling.
Martinenko v. 212 Steakhouse Inc. (2024) — Plaintiff Win. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft, Wrongful Termination, Failure to Accommodate. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft, Wrongful Termination and Failure to Accommodate.
Published opinions span New York. New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.