Skip to main content

Smith v. STERIS Corporation

N.D. OhioAugust 27, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00319
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
settlement
State
Ohio

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court approved a settlement agreement between plaintiff and defendants in a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) wage classification dispute. The case was dismissed with prejudice following the parties' agreement to settle the overtime wage claims.

What This Ruling Means

**Smith v. STERIS Corporation Settlement** This case involved a dispute over unpaid overtime wages under federal wage laws. An employee sued STERIS Corporation and related companies (TEL NEXX, Tokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, and Tokyo Electron America) claiming the company had incorrectly classified workers and failed to pay proper overtime compensation as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The court approved a settlement agreement between the employee and the companies in August 2024. Both sides agreed to resolve the overtime wage claims outside of court, and the case was dismissed with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled. The specific settlement terms were not disclosed publicly. This case matters for workers because it demonstrates that employees can successfully challenge their employers when they believe they're not receiving proper overtime pay. Many workers don't realize they may be entitled to overtime compensation even if their employer has classified them differently. The FLSA requires most employees to receive time-and-a-half pay for hours worked over 40 in a week. Workers who suspect their employer is incorrectly withholding overtime pay have legal options to seek the wages they've earned.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.