Hood v. Jordan Restaurant Group HQ LLC d/b/a Hen Quarter
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- motion to dismiss
- State
- Ohio
- Circuit
- Sixth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court granted plaintiff's motion to lift the stay as to non-bankrupt co-defendants (Keith Warren, Jordan Restaurant Group LLC, Jordan Hospitality Group LLC, and Jordan Restaurant Group HQ LLC), allowing the Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage claims to proceed against them. However, claims against bankrupt defendant Ron Jordan remain barred by the discharge injunction.
What This Ruling Means
Hood v. Jordan Restaurant Group: Court Ruling Summary
What Happened
An employee named Hood accused Jordan Restaurant Group and its owners of wage theft—failing to pay wages owed. The case involved multiple defendants, including owner Ron Jordan and several related business entities. When Ron Jordan filed for bankruptcy, it complicated the lawsuit because bankruptcy rules typically halt claims against bankrupt individuals.
What the Court Decided
The court allowed Hood's wage theft case to move forward against most defendants: Keith Warren, Jordan Restaurant Group LLC, Jordan Hospitality Group LLC, and Jordan Restaurant Group HQ LLC. However, claims against Ron Jordan remain blocked because of his bankruptcy discharge—a legal protection that stops old claims against bankrupt people.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling shows that bankruptcy doesn't necessarily shield all responsible parties. Even when one owner declares bankruptcy, employees can pursue wage claims against the company itself and other managers or co-owners. This means workers have multiple potential defendants to pursue for unpaid wages, increasing their chances of recovery.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Hood from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.