Skip to main content

Crandall v. McDonough

E.D. Pa.September 13, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00626
Plaintiff WinRaytheon Technologies Corporation$94,625.45 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiff Michael Holt prevailed on his ERISA benefits claim when the court denied defendants' summary judgment motion and remanded the matter to the plan administrator for reconsideration. The court awarded Holt $93,028.25 in attorney's fees and $1,597.20 in costs.

What This Ruling Means

**Crandall v. McDonough: Worker Wins Fight Over Denied Benefits** This case involved Michael Holt, who worked for Raytheon Technologies Corporation and was denied benefits under his employee benefit plan. When Holt applied for benefits he believed he was entitled to under ERISA (a federal law that protects employee benefit plans), the plan administrator rejected his claim. Holt sued to challenge this denial. The court sided with Holt and ruled against the defendants. The judge denied the company's request to dismiss the case and ordered that Holt's benefit claim be sent back to the plan administrator for a new review. The court also awarded Holt $93,028.25 to cover his attorney's fees and $1,597.20 for court costs, totaling $94,625.45. **What this means for workers:** This ruling shows that employees can successfully challenge denied benefit claims in court. When companies or plan administrators wrongly deny benefits, workers have legal rights and can fight back. The fact that the court ordered the company to pay the employee's legal fees is particularly important—it means workers may not have to worry about expensive legal costs when pursuing legitimate benefit claims they've been wrongfully denied.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.