Skip to main content

Lambert v. American Pizza Partners LP

W.D. Tex.April 4, 2023No. 6:22-cv-00782
Defendant WinMichigan First Credit Union$1,410 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Texas

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted defendant Michigan First Credit Union's request for attorney fees in the amount of $1,410.00 following summary judgment in defendant's favor on a breach of contract counterclaim.

What This Ruling Means

**Lambert v. American Pizza Partners LP: Court Awards Attorney Fees to Credit Union** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Lambert and Michigan First Credit Union over a breach of contract claim. The specific details of the original contract disagreement aren't provided, but the credit union filed a counterclaim against Lambert, arguing that Lambert had broken their contractual agreement. The court ruled in favor of Michigan First Credit Union, granting them summary judgment on their breach of contract counterclaim. Summary judgment means the court decided there were no disputed facts that required a trial, and the credit union clearly won their case. As part of this victory, the court also awarded the credit union $1,410 in attorney fees, meaning Lambert must pay the credit union's legal costs. This case matters for workers because it shows the potential financial risks of contract disputes with employers. When employees lose breach of contract cases, they may not only face the consequences of the breach itself but could also be required to pay their employer's attorney fees. This highlights the importance of carefully reviewing and understanding employment contracts before signing them, and seeking legal advice when contract disputes arise, as the financial stakes can extend beyond the original disagreement.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.