Skip to main content

Hunters Capital LLC v. City of Seattle

W.D. Wash.January 13, 2023No. 2:20-cv-00983
Plaintiff WinScripps Media, Inc.$201,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationHostile Work EnvironmentRetaliation

Outcome

Plaintiff Lisa Benson Cooper prevailed on two retaliation claims against her employer. The jury awarded her $1,000 in actual damages and $50,000 in punitive damages for 2015 retaliation, and $25,000 in actual damages and $125,000 in punitive damages for 2018 retaliation based on contract non-renewal. The court denied defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Lisa Benson Cooper sued her former employer, Scripps Media, Inc., claiming the company retaliated against her twice - once in 2015 and again in 2018 when they didn't renew her contract. Cooper argued that the company punished her for engaging in protected workplace activities, creating an illegal pattern of retaliation. **What the Court Decided** A jury sided with Cooper on both retaliation claims, awarding her a total of $201,000. For the 2015 incident, she received $1,000 to cover her actual losses plus $50,000 in punitive damages meant to punish the company. For the 2018 contract non-renewal, she got $25,000 in actual damages and $125,000 in punitive damages. The employer tried to overturn the verdict, but the court refused. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that employers cannot punish workers for exercising their workplace rights. The large punitive damage awards - totaling $175,000 - send a strong message that retaliation has serious consequences. Workers who face punishment for speaking up about workplace issues or filing complaints should know that courts take these violations seriously and will hold employers financially accountable for illegal retaliation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.