Skip to main content

Cabak, Allan v. JELD-WEN, Inc.

W.D. Wis.November 15, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00791
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Plaintiff's complaint was dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. The court found that plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts to support either an ADA discrimination claim or an ERISA claim, and also failed to exhaust administrative remedies required for the ADA claim.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Loses Disability Benefits Case Due to Insufficient Details** Allan Cabak sued his former employer JELD-WEN, Inc. claiming disability discrimination and wrongful denial of benefits. Cabak alleged the company violated his rights under disability laws and improperly denied him benefits he was entitled to receive. The court dismissed Cabak's entire lawsuit before it could proceed to trial. The judge ruled that Cabak failed to provide enough specific facts in his complaint to support either his discrimination claim or his benefits denial claim. Additionally, the court found that Cabak had not followed the required steps to first appeal his case through the company's internal complaint process before bringing it to court, which is mandatory for certain disability discrimination claims. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights two critical points for employees facing workplace discrimination or benefits denials. First, when filing a lawsuit, workers must include detailed, specific facts about what happened—general allegations aren't enough. Second, many employment laws require workers to exhaust all internal company complaint procedures before going to court. Failing to follow these administrative steps can result in a case being thrown out entirely, regardless of the merits. Workers should document incidents thoroughly and follow all required internal processes before considering legal action.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.