Skip to main content

The Ohio Valley Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of America International Union

N.D. W. Va.September 27, 2019No. 1:17-cv-00213
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
720 Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court granted the coal company's motion for summary judgment and vacated the arbitration award that found a grievance arbitrable, ruling that the repair and maintenance work on equipment used for coal slurry disposal was not within the union's work jurisdiction under the collective bargaining agreement.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Ohio Valley Coal Company and the United Mine Workers of America International Union got into a legal dispute over their contract and workplace practices. The two sides disagreed about what obligations the company had to follow under their labor agreement and how certain labor practices should be handled. This type of conflict is common when unions and employers interpret contract terms differently or when one side believes the other isn't living up to their agreed-upon responsibilities. **What the Court Decided:** The outcome of this case is not available in the public records, so it's unclear how the court ultimately resolved the dispute between the coal company and the union. **Why This Matters for Workers:** Even without knowing the final result, this case highlights how important union contracts are for protecting worker rights. When disputes arise between employers and unions over contract terms or workplace practices, workers can potentially be affected by changes in their working conditions, benefits, or job security. These legal battles often set precedents that influence how similar contract language is interpreted in other workplaces, making each case significant for the broader labor movement and union-represented employees.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.