Skip to main content

Pipe Fitters Local Union 120 Pension Plan, V. Scott Mcfarlane

Wash. Ct. App.December 9, 2024No. 85541-7
Plaintiff WinAvalara, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of defendants' motion to dismiss, holding that minority shareholders dissenting to a corporate merger are not limited to the statutory appraisal process as their exclusive remedy when fraud is alleged, allowing the shareholders' breach of fiduciary duty class action to proceed.

What This Ruling Means

**Pension Plan Dispute Case: Limited Information Available** This case involved a dispute between Pipe Fitters Local Union 120 Pension Plan and Scott McFarlane. Based on the available information, this appears to be a disagreement related to pension benefits or obligations, though the specific details of what triggered the dispute are not clear from the court records. Unfortunately, the court outcome could not be determined from the available case information. The case was filed in Washington state court in December 2024, but there are insufficient details to understand how the court ruled or what resolution was reached. No damages were reported in connection with this case. **What This Means for Workers:** While this specific case doesn't provide clear guidance, pension disputes generally involve important issues like benefit calculations, eligibility requirements, or payment obligations. Workers should know that they have legal options if they believe their pension rights have been violated. It's crucial to keep detailed records of pension communications and seek help from union representatives or employment attorneys when pension problems arise. Pension benefits are often governed by complex federal laws that protect workers' retirement security.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.