Peck v. Moen Incorporated
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Ohio
- Circuit
- Sixth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a settlement agreement resolving the collective action FLSA wage-and-hour claims. Plaintiffs will receive $25,569.16 in total damages distributed pro-rata based on weeks worked, with plaintiff's counsel receiving $35,000 in attorneys' fees and costs, and representative plaintiff receiving a $2,000 service award.
What This Ruling Means
Peck v. Moen Incorporated Settlement Summary
What Happened
Employees sued Moen Incorporated claiming the company failed to pay them properly for hours worked. Multiple workers joined together in this case to challenge what they believed was wage theft.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement where Moen agreed to pay $25,569.16 to compensate the affected workers. Each employee received a share of this money based on how many weeks they worked for the company. Additionally, the lawyers who handled the case received $35,000 for their fees and expenses, and the main employee representative received a $2,000 award for their role in pursuing the case.
Why This Matters for Workers
This settlement shows that employees can challenge employers through group lawsuits when they believe they've been underpaid. Even when a company disputes the claims, courts can require payment. Workers who suspect wage violations shouldn't assume they're alone—others may have experienced the same problem, making a collective case more powerful.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.