Skip to main content

PAMCAH-UA Local 675 Pension Fund v. Gordon Mechanical LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company

D. Haw.August 7, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00082
Plaintiff WinGordon Mechanical LLC$78,244.64 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment
State
Hawaii

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted plaintiffs' motion for entry of default judgment against defendant employer for failure to make required pension fund contributions under a collective bargaining agreement. Defendant was ordered to pay liquidated damages and attorneys' fees.

What This Ruling Means

Court Rules Against Gordon Mechanical LLC for Unpaid Pension Contributions

What Happened

Gordon Mechanical LLC, a Hawaii-based company, failed to pay money into a pension fund for its workers as required by a contract with their union (PAMCAH-UA Local 675). The pension fund organization sued the company to recover the missing payments.

What the Court Decided

The court sided with the pension fund. Because Gordon Mechanical didn't respond to the lawsuit or defend itself, the judge entered a default judgment against the company. Gordon Mechanical was ordered to pay $78,244.64 in damages, which covers the unpaid contributions plus additional penalties. The company must also pay the pension fund's attorney fees for bringing the case.

Why This Matters for Workers

This ruling reinforces that employers cannot simply ignore their legal obligations to contribute to worker pension plans. When companies fail to pay into these retirement accounts, workers lose money they earned. This decision sends a clear message: courts will hold employers accountable for unpaid pension contributions, even awarding extra penalties. For unionized workers especially, it strengthens protections for their retirement security.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.