Skip to main content

Julio Cruz v. Grace-Trinity Trading, Inc.

C.D. Cal.December 27, 2024No. 8:24-cv-02692
Plaintiff WinAsian Terrace Restaurant, Inc.$16,199.38 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

Plaintiff prevailed on default judgment after defendants failed to participate in the case. Court awarded damages for unpaid wages, overtime, spread-of-hours pay, statutory violations, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker's Disability Discrimination Case Dismissed by Federal Court** Julio Cruz filed a lawsuit against his employer, Grace-Trinity Trading, Inc., claiming the company discriminated against him because of his disability. Cruz alleged that the company treated him unfairly or took negative actions against him due to his disability status, which would violate federal anti-discrimination laws that protect workers with disabilities. The federal court in the Central District of California dismissed Cruz's case entirely. This means the court threw out his claims without awarding any money or other relief. The court likely found that Cruz either failed to prove his case or didn't meet the legal requirements needed to move forward with his disability discrimination claims. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows how challenging disability discrimination lawsuits can be to win. Workers who believe they've faced disability discrimination should gather strong evidence and understand that courts require specific proof to support these claims. It's important to document any discriminatory treatment and consult with employment attorneys who can help evaluate whether a case meets the legal standards needed to succeed in court. Not all discrimination claims will result in favorable outcomes for workers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.