Skip to main content

Mario Mendoza v. Mike Khachikian

C.D. Cal.January 2, 2025No. 8:24-cv-02805
Plaintiff WinG.H. Food Inc.$7,682.2 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff prevailed on wage and hour violations claims. After appeal and remand, the court recalculated damages from $7,749.79 to $7,682.20 plus prejudgment interest based on corrected regular rate calculations under FLSA and New York Labor Law.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins Back Pay After Employer Underpaid Wages** Mario Mendoza sued his former employer, G.H. Food Inc., claiming the company failed to pay him proper wages he was legally owed. This type of dispute is called wage theft, where employers don't pay workers the full amount required by law. The court ruled in Mendoza's favor, finding that G.H. Food Inc. had indeed violated wage and hour laws. The company was ordered to pay Mendoza $7,682.20 in back wages, plus additional interest for the time he went without this money. The case went through an appeals process, and when it came back to the lower court, the judge recalculated the exact amount owed based on federal and New York state labor law requirements for determining proper pay rates. This victory matters for workers because it shows that employees can successfully fight back when employers don't pay them correctly. Courts will enforce wage laws and require companies to pay what workers are legally owed, including compensation for the time workers had to go without their proper pay. Workers who believe they're being underpaid have legal protections and can seek help through the court system.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.