Skip to main content

Washington v. Lakeside Villas Apartment

M.D. Fla.January 3, 2025No. 6:24-cv-01606
Plaintiff WinJ. & A. Contractors Corp.$102,680.35 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation for default judgment against defendants on the issue of liability, awarding the union funds unpaid contributions, interest, and liquidated damages totaling approximately $102,680.35.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Orders Contractor to Pay Over $100,000 in Unpaid Union Contributions** This case involved J. & A. Contractors Corp., which failed to make required payments to union benefit funds for their workers. The company had a contract requiring them to contribute to these funds, which typically provide health insurance, pensions, and other benefits to union members. When the contractor stopped making these payments, the union sued to recover the missing money. The court ruled in favor of the union after J. & A. Contractors failed to properly defend themselves in court. The judge ordered the company to pay $102,680.35, which includes the unpaid contributions plus interest and additional penalties. This was considered a "default judgment" because the contractor didn't adequately respond to the lawsuit. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling reinforces that employers cannot simply ignore their contractual obligations to fund worker benefits. When companies agree to contribute to union funds as part of collective bargaining agreements, courts will enforce these promises. Workers covered by such agreements can take legal action to recover unpaid benefits, and employers may face significant financial penalties beyond just the original amounts owed. This protection helps ensure workers receive the benefits they've earned through their union contracts.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.