Skip to main content

Dalewitz v. JusLaw LLC

S.D.N.Y.December 7, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00457
Plaintiff WinO & M Pizza Corp.$259,689.99 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff Victor Cruz prevailed on his default judgment motion against O & M Pizza Corp. and Duraid Omar Alkhulaqi for FLSA and New York Labor Law violations. The court awarded total damages of $259,689.99 including compensatory damages, liquidated damages, interest, statutory penalties, and attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

**Employment Dispute Dismissed Against Legal Services Company** A worker named Dalewitz filed an employment-related lawsuit against JusLaw LLC, a legal services company, in federal court in New York. While the specific details of what workplace issues Dalewitz claimed are not provided in the available information, the case involved employment law violations against the company. The court decided to dismiss the case entirely. This means the judge threw out Dalewitz's claims without awarding any money or other remedies. Court dismissals can happen for various reasons, such as failing to prove the claims, missing legal deadlines, or not following proper procedures when filing the lawsuit. **What This Means for Workers:** This case serves as a reminder that winning employment lawsuits requires meeting specific legal standards and following court procedures carefully. When courts dismiss cases, workers receive no compensation and may be responsible for their own legal costs. For employees considering legal action against their employers, this highlights the importance of having strong evidence, understanding relevant employment laws, and potentially working with experienced employment attorneys who can properly navigate the legal system and build compelling cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.