Skip to main content

Kroll LLC v. Povinelli

S.D.N.Y.January 6, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01977
Plaintiff Win5th Ave. Kings Fruit & Vegetables Corp.$36,868 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
880 Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016)
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
bench trial

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

Plaintiff prevailed on minimum wage, overtime, and wage theft prevention claims. The court awarded $13,434 in unpaid wages, $13,434 in liquidated damages, $10,000 in statutory penalties, and prejudgment interest, though not all damages sought were awarded.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins $36,868 in Wage Theft Case Against Fruit and Vegetable Company** This case involved a worker named Povinelli who sued 5th Ave. Kings Fruit & Vegetables Corp. for not paying proper wages and wrongfully firing him. Povinelli claimed the company failed to pay minimum wage and overtime, and violated wage theft prevention laws. The court ruled in favor of the worker and awarded him $36,868 total. This included $13,434 in unpaid wages that should have been paid originally, another $13,434 in liquidated damages (essentially doubling the unpaid amount as punishment to the employer), $10,000 in statutory penalties, and additional interest. While Povinelli didn't receive everything he asked for, he won on his main claims about minimum wage, overtime, and wage theft prevention violations. This case shows workers have legal protections when employers don't pay proper wages. Courts can order employers to pay not just the missing wages, but additional penalties and damages that can significantly increase the total amount. Workers in similar situations should know they may be entitled to double damages plus penalties, making it worthwhile to pursue legal action against wage theft.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.