Skip to main content

Boyle v. Nelson

D. Or.January 23, 2025No. 6:22-cv-01361
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment
State
Oregon

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiffs obtained default judgment against defendants for Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law violations. Court awarded damages to both plaintiffs and attorneys' fees and costs.

What This Ruling Means

**Workers Win $307,000 in Wage Theft Case** Two workers sued their employers, 2009 Bamkp Corp. (doing business as La Antillana) and St. Nicholas JM Deli Grocery, Inc., claiming they were not paid properly for their work. The employees argued their employers violated both federal and New York state wage laws by failing to pay them correctly. The court ruled in favor of the workers and awarded them $307,348.11 in damages. The employers received a "default judgment," which typically means they failed to respond to the lawsuit or participate in their defense. The court found that the companies violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (the main federal wage law) and New York Labor Law. In addition to the money damages for the workers, the court also ordered the employers to pay the workers' attorney fees and court costs. This case shows that workers have strong legal protections when employers don't pay wages properly. Even if employers try to ignore wage theft lawsuits, courts will still hold them accountable and order them to pay what workers are owed, plus additional penalties and legal costs.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.