Skip to main content

Rosario v. Prasad Cosmetic Surgery

E.D.N.Y.February 13, 2025No. 2:21-cv-02944
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The parties reached a settlement agreement on all issues in this FLSA wage-and-hour case. The court issued an order requiring court or DOL approval of the settlement before dismissal with prejudice, or alternatively allowing dismissal without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A) with specific conditions.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins Settlement in Wage Theft Case Against Restaurant** A worker named Rosario filed a lawsuit against Fiscardo, Inc., which operates the Orion Diner & Grill, claiming the restaurant failed to pay proper wages. The case involved violations of federal wage and hour laws, meaning the employer allegedly didn't pay what was legally required under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The court case ended when both sides reached a settlement agreement, meaning they worked out a deal to resolve the dispute without going to trial. However, the court added an important requirement: any settlement in this type of wage case must be approved either by the court itself or by the U.S. Department of Labor before the case can be officially closed. This extra step ensures the settlement is fair to the worker. This case matters for workers because it shows that employees can successfully challenge employers who don't pay proper wages. The court's requirement for settlement approval also protects workers from being pressured into unfair deals. If you believe your employer isn't paying you correctly, federal law provides ways to fight back, and courts take these violations seriously.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.