Skip to main content

Rayner v. Pfizer, Inc.

S.D.N.Y.February 19, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00803
Plaintiff WinConcrete Industries One Corp.$193,747.34 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
445 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted the petition to confirm an arbitration award against Concrete Industries One Corp. for failure to remit required contributions to union pension and welfare funds totaling $193,747.34 plus accruing interest.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Confirms Company Must Pay Union Benefits** This case involved Concrete Industries One Corp., which failed to make required payments to union pension and welfare funds for its workers. The company was supposed to contribute money to these employee benefit funds as part of its agreement with the union, but it stopped making the payments. The dispute went to arbitration, where an arbitrator ruled that the company owed $193,747.34 to the union funds. When the company refused to pay, the matter went to court. The court confirmed the arbitration award, meaning Concrete Industries must pay the full amount plus additional interest that continues to build up over time. This ruling is important for workers because it shows that courts will enforce companies' obligations to contribute to employee benefit funds. When employers try to skip out on pension and health insurance contributions that were promised as part of union contracts, workers can take legal action to recover what they're owed. The decision reinforces that these benefit contributions aren't optional extras that companies can abandon when convenient – they're contractual obligations that courts will enforce to protect workers' retirement security and healthcare benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.