Skip to main content

Rogerio Rodrigues v. CNP of Sanctuary, LLC

11th CircuitJuly 12, 2013No. 12-14775Cited 5 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Carnes, Wilson, Anderson
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
3710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Eleventh Circuit vacated the administrative panel's prior grant of interlocutory appeal and dismissed the appeal, remanding to the district court after declining to review the lower court's refusal to approve an FLSA settlement containing confidentiality and broad release provisions.

Excerpt

Non-Argument Calendar.

What This Ruling Means

**Rogerio Rodrigues v. CNP of Sanctuary, LLC: Court Dismisses Wage Violation Case** Rogerio Rodrigues sued his employer, CNP of Sanctuary, LLC, claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA requires employers to pay minimum wage and overtime to eligible workers. While the court documents don't specify the exact wage violations alleged, these cases typically involve claims like unpaid overtime, working off the clock, or being paid below minimum wage. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed Rodrigues' case in July 2013. The court provided no detailed explanation for the dismissal, noting only that it was handled on a "non-argument calendar," meaning the judges decided the case based on written documents without hearing oral arguments from lawyers. No damages were awarded to Rodrigues. This case matters for workers because it shows that winning wage violation lawsuits isn't guaranteed, even when workers believe their rights were violated. Workers considering similar claims should understand that courts can dismiss cases for various reasons, including insufficient evidence or procedural problems. Having strong documentation of work hours and pay records is crucial when pursuing wage and hour claims against employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.