No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiff Diana Hintsa settled wage-and-hour claims against Greenbelt Ambulatory Surgery, LP and Rockville Ambulatory Surgery, LP for unpaid wages and liquidated damages. The court approved the settlement awarding plaintiff $2,264.26 in unpaid wages, $2,264.26 in liquidated damages, $10,674.85 in attorneys' fees, and $1,575.15 in costs.
Hintsa v. Greenbelt Ambulatory Surgery Settlement Summary
What Happened
Diana Hintsa filed a lawsuit against Greenbelt Ambulatory Surgery and Rockville Ambulatory Surgery, claiming the companies failed to pay her wages that she had earned. This type of case is called wage theft—when employers don't properly compensate workers for time worked.
What the Court Decided
The case was settled, meaning both sides agreed to end the dispute without a full trial. The company agreed to pay Hintsa $4,528.52 in total damages. This included $2,264.26 for her actual unpaid wages and an equal amount in additional damages as a penalty. The company also had to pay $10,674.85 toward her attorneys' fees and $1,575.15 in court costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that employees can successfully challenge wage theft. Courts can award not just the missing pay, but extra penalties to discourage employers from breaking wage laws. Workers who believe they haven't been paid fairly have legal options to recover their earnings, and employers must cover the costs of these legal actions.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.