Skip to main content

Dizon v. Alegre

E.D. Cal.March 18, 2025No. 1:23-cv-01366
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
settlement

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The parties reached a settlement agreement through mediation on all issues in this Fair Labor Standards Act wage-and-hour case. The court ordered that the settlement must be approved by either the court or the Department of Labor before the case can be dismissed with prejudice.

What This Ruling Means

**Dizon v. Alegre Employment Case Summary** This case involved a dispute between a worker and ESB Kitchen and Bar Corp over unpaid wages. The employee claimed the restaurant violated federal wage and hour laws, likely involving issues like unpaid overtime, minimum wage violations, or other compensation problems covered under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The case was resolved through a settlement agreement reached during mediation, meaning both sides agreed to terms without going to trial. However, the court added an important requirement: either the court itself or the Department of Labor must approve the settlement before the case can be officially closed. This extra step of oversight is designed to protect workers in wage cases. **What this means for workers:** This case shows that employees can successfully challenge employers who don't pay proper wages. Even when cases settle out of court, there are safeguards in place to ensure workers get fair deals. The required approval process helps prevent employers from pressuring workers into accepting inadequate settlements. If you believe your employer has violated wage laws, you have legal options available, and courts take these protections seriously.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.