Skip to main content

D'Arcangelo v. The Funded Trader LLC

W.D. Tex.March 21, 2025No. 1:23-cv-01472
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment
State
Texas

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff obtained a default judgment against debt collection defendants for FDCPA violations. The court awarded $700 in statutory damages and $1,000 in attorneys' fees, rejecting plaintiff's request for the full $1,000 statutory maximum.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins Case Against Debt Collectors for Improper Practices** A worker named D'Arcangelo sued debt collection companies Hartfield Portfolio Group and Harbinger Processing Group for violating federal debt collection laws. The case involved improper debt collection practices that broke rules designed to protect consumers from harassment and unfair treatment by debt collectors. The court ruled in favor of D'Arcangelo after the debt collection companies failed to respond to the lawsuit (called a "default judgment"). The judge awarded $1,700 total: $700 in damages for the violations and $1,000 to cover attorney fees. However, the court did not grant the full $1,000 maximum penalty that D'Arcangelo had requested for the violations. This case matters for workers because it shows that debt collectors must follow strict federal rules when trying to collect money. Workers who face improper debt collection tactics—such as harassment, false threats, or misleading communications—have legal rights and can fight back in court. Even when workers win these cases, courts may not always award the maximum penalties allowed by law. Workers dealing with aggressive debt collectors should know they have protections under federal law and may be able to recover damages plus attorney fees if collectors break the rules.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.