Rahman v. Red Chili Indian Cafe, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiffs Rahman and Shah prevailed in their wage and hour claims against Red Chili Indian Cafe, Inc. and individual defendants. The court awarded Rahman $38,880 in damages plus interest and Shah $66,472.50 in damages plus interest, along with joint attorneys' fees of $20,895.
What This Ruling Means
Rahman v. Red Chili Indian Cafe, Inc.
What Happened
Two workers, Rahman and Shah, sued Red Chili Indian Cafe, Inc. in New York federal court, claiming the restaurant failed to pay them wages they had properly earned. This type of case is called wage theft—when employers don't pay workers the full amount they're owed for hours worked.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with the workers. The judge ruled that Rahman and Shah had indeed been wrongly underpaid. Rahman received $38,880 in damages plus interest, while Shah received $66,472.50 plus interest. The restaurant was also ordered to pay the workers' legal fees of $20,895.
Why This Matters
This case demonstrates that workers have legal protection against wage theft. When employers illegally withhold pay, courts can force them to pay back wages with interest and cover legal costs. The substantial damages awarded send a message that violating wage laws has real financial consequences for businesses. Workers who suspect they haven't been paid fairly have a path to recover what they're owed through the legal system.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Rahman from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.