Rahman v. Red Chili Indian Cafe, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court granted default judgment against Red Chili Indian Cafe and individual defendants on all wage-and-hour claims under FLSA and New York Labor Law, finding defendants liable for minimum wage, overtime, spread of hours, pay stub, notice, and expense violations. Court denied default judgment only on plaintiff Rahman's retaliation claim under NYLL § 215, which proceeds to inquest on damages.
What This Ruling Means
Rahman v. Red Chili Indian Cafe, Inc.
What Happened
Rahman worked at Red Chili Indian Cafe in New York and filed a lawsuit claiming the restaurant failed to pay him properly. He alleged the restaurant violated wage laws by not paying minimum wage, overtime pay, and other required compensation. Rahman also claimed the restaurant retaliated against him for complaining about these practices.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with Rahman on most claims. The judge found Red Chili Indian Cafe and its owners violated federal and New York wage laws in multiple ways—including failing to pay minimum wage and overtime, not providing proper pay stubs, and violating rules about work schedules. However, the court still needs to determine how much money Rahman should receive. The retaliation claim will proceed to a separate hearing to calculate damages.
Why This Matters
This case reinforces that restaurants and other employers must follow strict wage rules. Workers who aren't paid properly can sue for violations. The ruling shows courts take these violations seriously and will hold employers accountable, even when employers don't respond to lawsuits.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Rahman from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.