Skip to main content

Cojom v. Roblen, LLC

D. Conn.April 9, 2025No. 3:23-cv-01669
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

Court granted in part and denied in part cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff's disability discrimination claim was dismissed, but her disability retaliation claim proceeds to trial. Defendant's counterclaims regarding confidentiality breaches were also addressed.

What This Ruling Means

**Cojom v. Roblen, LLC: Mixed Ruling on Disability Claims** This case involved an employee who sued Bernstein Allergy Group, claiming the company discriminated against her because of her disability, failed to provide reasonable accommodations, and retaliated against her for asserting her rights. The court reached a split decision on the employee's claims. The judge dismissed her disability discrimination claim, finding insufficient evidence to proceed to trial on that issue. However, the court allowed her retaliation claim to move forward, meaning a jury will decide whether the company illegally punished her for complaining about disability-related treatment. The court also addressed the employer's counterclaims about the employee allegedly breaching confidentiality agreements. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that even when some discrimination claims fail, retaliation claims can still succeed. Employers cannot legally punish employees for filing disability-related complaints or requesting accommodations, even if the underlying discrimination claim is weak. Workers should know they have protection when speaking up about workplace disability issues, and that retaliation cases often have different legal standards than the original discrimination claims. Each type of claim is evaluated separately by courts.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.