Cojom v. Roblen, LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- Connecticut
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff won default judgment on wage and hour claims under FLSA and CMWA for unpaid minimum wages and overtime, with damages of $214,293.22 awarded, plus attorneys' fees granted.
What This Ruling Means
Cojom v. Roblen, LLC: Court Orders Company to Pay for Unpaid Wages
What Happened
A worker named Cojom sued Roblen, LLC, claiming the company failed to pay proper wages. Specifically, Cojom alleged that Roblen didn't pay minimum wage or overtime pay as required by law.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in Cojom's favor and ordered Roblen to pay $214,293.22 in damages. The company must also pay the worker's attorney fees. The court applied both federal wage laws and state wage laws in reaching this decision.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that courts take wage theft seriously. Workers who aren't paid minimum wage or overtime have legal protection and can win significant compensation through the courts. The company also had to cover legal costs, which can make pursuing these claims more affordable for workers. If your employer isn't paying you properly, this ruling shows that the law is on your side, and you may be entitled to recover unpaid wages plus additional damages.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.