Skip to main content

Erwine v. United States

D. Nev.April 23, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00045
Plaintiff WinC.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.$500,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict
State
Nevada

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to Accommodate

Outcome

Plaintiff prevailed on failure to warn and negligence claims against manufacturers of a hernia mesh device, with a jury verdict awarding $500,000 in damages. Defendants' post-verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law was denied.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins $500,000 in Defective Medical Device Case** This case involved a worker named Erwine who suffered injuries from a defective hernia mesh medical device manufactured by C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc. Erwine claimed the companies failed to properly warn about the device's risks and were negligent in how they designed or manufactured the product. The court sided with Erwine completely. A jury found that the manufacturers were responsible for failing to provide adequate warnings about the dangers of their hernia mesh device and were negligent in their handling of the product. The jury awarded Erwine $500,000 in damages. When the companies tried to overturn this decision after the trial, the court rejected their request and upheld the jury's verdict. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that employees can successfully hold medical device manufacturers accountable when defective products cause workplace injuries or health problems. If you're hurt by faulty medical equipment or devices at work, you may have legal options beyond just workers' compensation. The substantial damages awarded here demonstrate that courts take these cases seriously and will order significant compensation when companies fail to protect workers from dangerous products.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
People in re S.L. and A.L
COLOCTAPPDec 2017

The Rio Blanco County Department of Human Services (Department) became involved with the parents in this case as a result of concerns about the children's welfare due to the condition of the family home, the parents' use of methamphetamine, and criminal cases involving the parents. Attempts at voluntary services failed, and on the Department's petition for dependency and neglect, the district court ultimately terminated the parents' rights. On appeal, the parents contended that the Department failed to make reasonable efforts to reunify them with their children. Specifically, the parents contended that the Department did not give them sufficient time to complete the services under their treatment plans and failed to accommodate their drug testing needs. The termination hearing was not held until more than a year after the motion to terminate was filed. For nine months before the motion to terminate was filed, the Department provided numerous services to the parents, including substance abuse therapy, therapeutic visitation supervision, drug abuse monitoring, and a parental capacity evaluation. The Department also provided counseling for the children. Both parents missed drug tests and tested positive during the testing period, and both were arrested for possession of methamphetamine during the pendency of the case. The Department made reasonable accommodations to meet the parents' needs and the parents had sufficient time to comply with their treatment plans. The record supports the trial court's findings that termination was appropriate because (1) the court-approved appropriate treatment plan had not been complied with by the parents or had not been successful in rehabilitating them (2) the parents were unfit and (3) the conduct or condition of the parents was unlikely to change within a reasonable time. Father also contended that the trial court's decision to interview the 9-year-old twin children together in chambers fundamentally and seriously affected the basi

Defendant Win
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Plaintiff Win
James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health Lab
9th CircuitNov 2000
Mixed Result
Wright
10th CircuitAug 2001
Defendant Win

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.